If the status of a paper's submission changes directly from - Quora This is known as a rescinding. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. A final decision of acceptance or rejection of the revised manuscript is made by the editors as soon as they conclude that they have sufficient information at hand for doing so. However, the Editor, in the rejection letter, provided an objective explanation for this long wait. You said the finals started tomorrow. Authors often ask for a new referee to be consulted, particularly in cases where two referees have been used and one is negative, the other positive. //--> Research suggests that . This will reduce delays. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); v. t. e. Sovereignty generally refers to the supreme authority of a state or territory. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Do the revisions and resubmit. A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). The process was on par with other journal experiences, but I do not appreciate the inconsistency between what the editor at Nature Medicine told me when transferring to Nature Comms, and the final evaluation at Nature Comms. edit: so no. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. 2022.5.11 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received, 2022.5.12 Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration, 6.2Manuscript under considerationNS, Decision sent to author, NZip for reviewers, 9All Reviewers Assigned109Manuscript under consideration, 2022.10.10 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, , comments, #1, #2, #3IMEC&, 2022.11.23 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received/Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration (), 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned), 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration, 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, #1hhhh, #3comment. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Journal Said "Major Revisions" Needed? Here's What to Do Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. 9.3 weeks. Welcome to the Northern Ireland Assembly web site, which was set up to inform interested viewers of the day-to-day business and historical background of devolved Government in Northern Ireland. Internet Explorer). ]]> The Senior Editor then assesses the manuscript for its quality and perceived level of advance and then either recommends a reject decision or assigns peer reviewers. . On submission, the manuscript is assigned to an editor covering the subject area, who seeks informal advice from scientific advisors and editorial colleagues, and who makes this initial decision. Nature (journal) - Wikipedia Frontiers | Editors between Support and Control by the Digital No, Modified on: Fri, 10 Sep, 2021 at 3:16 PM. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision on manuscript, with the associate editor (AE) making the initial decision. [CDATA[> Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript All Rights Reserved. All referees agree to Nature's conditions before Nature sends them a manuscript to assess. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. I am currently continuing at SunAgri as an R&D engineer. Sorry we couldn't be helpful. The manuscript subject falls outside of the Aims and Scope of the selected journal or is not likely to be of interest to the readership of the selected journal. youre still in the running. Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . Bulk update symbol size units from mm to map units in rule-based symbology. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. Yet, little is known about how these infrastructures support, stabilize, transform or change existing editorial practices. Decisions, decisions | Nature Neuroscience How did it go for you after this? What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made Nature | Peer-Review Duration, Review Speed, Revision Process Experiments gone wrong? How long does it take to publish a paper in Journal? Short answer: the editor will continue to try and find other suitable reviewers, sending them invitations and waiting for replies. Share. It could mean just about anything. n/a. Motivation: The total time it took for the manuscript to be rejected without being sent for review was too long, in our opinion (1 month). The first step in making the right decision is recognizing the problem or opportunity and deciding to address it. A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. Most respectable journals have a definite map designed since submission, first editoroial decision, review time, last editorial decision, Editing and publication. In light of their advice, I am delighted to say that we can in principle offer to publish it in Nature, provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. It doesnt mean anything other than the editor has started to look at your paper. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. How can we prove that the supernatural or paranormal doesn't exist? Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? Under these circumstances, revised papers are not usually sent back to the referees because further technical work has not been required, but are accepted for publication once the editors have checked that the referees suggestions have been implemented and the paper is in the required format (the. What does Enterococcus faecalis look like. Weigh all of your options and look at the merits of the rejection. The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. Editorial process : Springer Support Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. The above box-and-whisker plots show the days to decision for manuscripts submitted . Manuscripts should be submitted via our online manuscript submission system. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. Determine why this decision will make a difference to your customers or fellow employees. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. To obtain We suggest that authors send proofs to co-authors for them to check, but request that changes among the co-authors are coordinated so that only one author communicates with Nature and only one set of corrections is sent. Is it possible to create a concave light? One reason is because each referee sees only a tiny fraction of the papers submitted and is deeply knowledgeable about one field, whereas the editors, who see all the papers submitted, can have a broader perspective and a wider context from which to view the paper. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. resubmitnoveltyresubmit, 4. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? It can impact your confidence and make you question your ability and skill. Table 11 sketches the different situations the editor may encounter and the decision s/he usually makes in each of these situations. Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? //-->